Tolerance is not same as
temperature – there is no ready, reliable or consistent measurement for it. This
immeasurability, and consequent subjectivity is central to the current debate
surrounding the issue. One of the most eminent and successful Bollywood star
made a public remark that sparked a wildfire among Indian Internet users and
like many such debates on internet – this one too seems to be going down a rat
hole.
In paragraphs that follow, there
is an attempt to view this episode from a slightly different perspective.
Tolerance is very contextual, for
example our tolerance to hot water while taking shower is different during
different seasons. Similarly, in a society there are bound to be times when
public opinion could be more tolerant than other times. Not only with respect to time, public opinion
also changes based on subjects, themes, circumstances and backdrops – it is
possible that a society has more tolerance towards love marriages than same sex
marriages.
Tolerance is also an evolving
phenomenon – and many factors shape it continuously. A classic example of this
is changing tolerance levels for issues like climate change and corruption –
with increased awareness of energy crisis, our tolerance to problems effecting
environment reduces, similarly as people become more aware of their own rights,
their tolerance to corruption also reduces. Both these examples are, of course
a welcome change. A point to note here is that by itself, reduction or increase
in tolerance level cannot be an indicative of type, it has to be placed in context
of subject – one at a time. Direct
verdict of either tolerant or intolerant is akin to saying someone scored
100/100 - but not knowing in which subject/field. J
Besides being contextual and
evolving, tolerance is also impacted by resources available at hand. For
example, if the domestic help becomes extremely costly from tomorrow – then certain
outsourced chores may have to either done on one’s own or ignored – in both
cases, cleanliness and orderliness of household chores may reduce – and tolerance
for that will need to be increased or adjusted. J
If one were to look at an example
of national level, it can be said that for a developing nation if literacy
holds higher priority than space research – then tolerance towards illiteracy should
be lower as compared to tolerance towards moderate or low advancement in space
research. And as country’s demographics change, objectives evolve these
priorities may undergo changes too.
Now that we know above points on
tolerance, it makes sense to check the environment in light of these points
with reference to India
- What are the areas where we, as a country have shown volatile approach with respect to tolerance? – besides our tolerance of Indian cricket team which changes in direct correlation with their wins/losses
- What are the areas where tolerance has evolved over last few years, may be generations. What are the things that our parents had to do with permission from their parents but we do it today at our free-will?
- What are the areas where tolerance level of society directly impacts our daily life, how much the corruption in road construction impact the price of milk we buy everyday? Are the priorities of our nation in right order – if something pressing is missing, we may want to enquire and re-align.
The fact that we are a vibrant
and fully functioning democracy, is itself the biggest achievement of overall
tolerance, ability to debate, reason and argue. We must treasure, protect and
enhance it. Think on above three points and share your thoughts with friends,relatives and me.
As for Aamir Khan, the expression
of his spouse is not a very well-thought I believe, it is similar to an
exhausted, tired and a little bit resigned feeling we all get on soupy Sunday afternoons
where we think that perhaps going to some other place might be the answer to
all questions we are grappling with. As almost everyone knows, going somewhere
else is never an answer. In hindsight, perhaps it could be said/interpreted and
circulated a bit more maturity.
And still, let’s, for a moment,
suppose Aamir really wanted to leave – then let’s be sport and suggest some
good countries, rather than vehement and childish demands of sending him to specific
troubled countries. J
My suggestion would be Bhutan, What’s
yours?
